Wednesday, September 26, 2012

trusciencetrutechnology@blogspot.com
Vol.2012, Issue No.9, Dated: 21 September 2012
Time 3h28mP.M.
Mystic Role of Quantum Theory
By
Professor Kotcherlakota Lakshmi Narayana
{Retd.Prof.of Physics, SU} 17-11-10, Narasimha Ashram, Official Colony,
Maharanipeta.P.O. Visakhapatnam-530002. Cell: 9491902867

ABSTRACT
           An unconventional approach to Quantum Theory implies possible mixing up the quantum numbers generally allotted to the individual Quanta. The Prof K R Rao’s studies made in 1923-1925 for Madras University D.Sc. Thesis imply the fractional quantum numbers for p-states of Atomic Spectra. The approach to the Gravity Physics extended to explain the fractional quantum numbers.

Mysticism
               Early in human history, Indian scholars pondered much about the Universe. In their own way, they elaborated the mysticism and philosophy to suit their way of living. The unfortunates that pondered on India have established themselves to cater their needs and pleasures. The human quest for knowledge in the form of Pundits and Purohits was totally lost except a few who claim of their living in Himalayas of the past and presently no such individual to speak off really exists. The conception of knowledge has evolved freshly with the past destroyed willfully. The depiction of several Gods and Goddesses (numbers increase now beyond the 33crore Gods or Goddesses propounded earlier) by Indian thought, deed of forms and figures, is just a glimpse of unforgettable human endeavor that had its influence on people for several generations. The glory of the West Philosophers in such representations of the scriptures and dedication, of human suffering to uphold the right is remarkable. Human quest for knowledge has opened new avenues. Amassing the wealth and Gold money has triumphed from the past. This led to new National holds. What is knowledge seems to be a quest even to date.

Knowledge conception
               Knowledge conception offers two possibilities one an imaginary barrier that science is presumed to be able to pass through and another, a real barrier that only our imagination can really penetrate through, as the Scientists David Deutsch & Artur Ekert assert (Ref.1). The idea that we are confined and imprisoned inside a finite bubble or bottle of familiar objects and events, conceptually understood by the later argument is not the familiar view. For the argument that the infinity used is inaccessible to exploration and to explanation seems to be vague. Investigations in Science do reveal new horizons and transcend us into realm of other thoughts and worlds of knowledge. Therefore, it is a passport to the bounded knowledge and unbound humility.

Quantum theory
               Quantum theory suggested by few to support the later argument. It seems theorists taught students irrationality and they are not supposed to ask that question of its validity. It seems things happen without reason or explanation. Many a texts and the familiarization descriptions of quantum theory have said so. A comparative study of classical mechanics and the quantum theory approaches to muster the vague knowledge of the microscopic world asserted by the later to fully harnessing the nature. It is a gratifying to know that these impediments have really ever materialized. Quantum mechanics is liberating us from the misknowledge. The ideas of superposition, entanglement, discreteness and the randomness etc in quantum mechanics are found useful as resources rather than as impediments. Extraordinary devices like the ultra chips and the sharp and finite miniature lasers devised.

Communications techniques
            Communications techniques and computational measures have grossly changed with the advent of quantum mechanics. They often said as just the beginning of a new world. Novel ways of discovering the nature and creating advanced knowledge has become a reality. Moore Law predictions of doubling the knowledge led to the miniaturization of the devices to the level of individual atoms. Engineers can enter the realm of the unsurpassable.

Simultaneous observation
            The uncertainty principle brought in the limitations on simultaneous observation of several of the physical entities. With the limitations, it laid the conditions due to cause and effect what not be inferred cannot be controlled. Familiar the tiny objects with attributes of rampant randomness and covered by impossible correlations. The success of quantum physics over the quantum world is predominant, in the sense that quantum computations encode information over tiny objects.

The precession
           The precession has improved despite the uncertainty principle. How the quantum computers have gained exquisite precision with information embedded on elementary particles? Error-correction procedures can compensate for decoherence long enough to complete a computation. Information spread over multiple particles, by Physicists, or encode it in geometric form that avoids noise.

            An important observation by the authors mentioned earlier was that although mathematical truths are independent of Physics, knowledge of them apparently gained by physical processes. Which, truths are hidden forever? Mathematicians with pure abstractions will be able to see these also prove them. A mathematical proof is a sequence of logical operations (logic as defined by the Western world). Srinivas Ramanujam in 19 century in India has obtained many a mathematical proofs even the fractional calculus of integration and differentiation without the so-called logical approach. Obviously, judgment was rooted in the realm of the Physical World. The operations involved were so simple and beyond the comprehension of a Western mind. It is apparently clear that the repertoire of such elementary computations to master the abstractions presented by Srinivas Ramanujam. Hindu mathematics as it was termed to see and prove the truths that would otherwise remain hidden totally. Has the Srinivas Ramanjum Brain worked that pulled the factors at the outset, as if pulled out of a magician’s hat?

Bad Philosophy
            The division of Mathematics and Physics to understand the Nature of the World is it a paradigm? Does the Mathematics, be turned out as an empirical science with results drawn not simply by careful reasoning but also by careful experimentation? Quantum Physics provides the tool for such an approach and makes it paradigm to resolve several special issues. Germans like Schrodinger, who mastered the Vedas and the concept of Shiva (many books in AU library getting rotten) to describe the different evolution histories of a particle, has agreed upon not simply alternatives but as well all that really happen simultaneously. Caution is for falling prey to bad Physics. Philosophy (as understood in Western world) and Fundamental Physics so closely linked that once it nosedived along with it the Physics dwindled. Now people believe that Physics is dragging back the philosophy back on its track.

Beyond The Wave Functions
              The direct product description presents new vistas of knowledge in the World of Physics. In fact, even without them earlier in year, 1930A.D Prof. Madhav has brought an equation for several spin particles and the theory for the higher order spins. I am surprised to see in his papers, some given to me by him (Ref.2), a spin 2 Equation, see the photocopy of page 141 Eq. 12b and reproduced here.


             B. S. Madhava Rao (Ref.2) has not used the Direct Product representations for describing the spins of higher order. I have developed a novel approach to obtain matrices of the spin 2 and associated particles.
Table I

Terms         3χ 1                 3χ 0                   3χ -1                      1χ 0

3χ 1          3χ 1* 3χ 1       3χ 1* 3χ 0          3χ 1* 3χ -1          3χ 1* 1χ 0

3χ 0          3χ 0* 3χ 1       3χ 0* 3χ 0          3χ 0* 3χ -1          3χ 0* 1χ 0

3χ -1         3χ -1* 3χ 1      3χ -1* 3χ 0        3χ -1* 3χ -1         3χ -1* 1χ 0

1χ 0           1χ 0* 3χ 1       1χ 0* 3χ 0         1χ 0* 3χ -1           1χ 0* 1χ 0

Spin Formulation yields the matrix note the diagonal elements as
                       (2,2);      (2,0);       (2,-2)       and          (0,0).

Table II
                                            Terms
              (1,1)      (1,0)       (1,-1)        (0,0)

(1,1)      (2,2)        (2,1)      (2,0)          (1,1)

(1,0)        (2,1)       (2,0)      (2,-1)       (1,0)

(1,-1)       (2,0)       (2,-1)     (2,-2)      (1,-1)

(0,0)        (1,1)       (1,0)       (1,-1)      (0,0)
Hence, we got the spin zero but as well the spin(minus) -2 values. But the associated (2 , 1) implies a Photon variable (as well an Anti-Photon presented in Warangle Reg. Engg. College) that was envisaged by the present author in the year 1984, while he was employed in Shivaji University, Kolhapur-416004 (Refs. 3 & 5). The (2 , 0) on the other hand represents a scalar entity with the spin 2. 
Nevertheless, more intriguing is the physics representation of the elementary particles especially bosons of this article. Perhaps a better representation would be as follows:
Table III

Terms
                (1,1)                (1,0)             (1,-1)            (0,0)

(1,1)    (1+1,1+1)      (1+1,1+0)         (1+1,1-1)     (1+0,1+0)

(1,0)    (1+1,1+0)      (1+1,0+0)         (1+1,0-1)     (1+0,0+0)

(1,-1)    (1+1,-1+1)    (1+1,-1+0)      (1+1,-1-1)     (1+0,-1+0)

(0,0)      (0+1,0+1)     (0+1,0+0)       (0+1,0-1)     (0+0,0+0)
This implies that the photon (Ref.3) we thought associated with the Graviton of Spin 2 particles is a composite scalar particle and its excess energy presumably due to some scalar components. Spin 1 identifiable with the photon but our presentation made here points out that the photon associated with graviton has a scalar particle embedded with it. This is a very new finding of paramount importance.
Consider the

Matrix = [2 1 0 1; 1 0 -1 0; 0 -1 -2 -1; 1 0 -1 0]

obtained from the Table II above and diagnolization of the above matrix yields the four eigenvalues as -2.83, -0, 0 and 2.83.The fractional eigenvalue is really a surprising thing. Possibly be interpreted as sequel to the non-appearance of spin 1 contributions rather explicitly. The two distinct eigenvalues non-vanishing indeed represent the two possible solutions of the algebraic equation. We infer here that the 0 eigenvalues correspond to the possible scalar entities associated with the Graviton and the Anti-Graviton respectively. In conventional diagram the Graviton (spin +2) and Anti-Graviton (spin -2) are easy to depict but the two zeros (scalar particles) tend differ in orientation location.

         Madhava Rao (Ref.2) Equation cited above, for spin2 leads to the algebraic roots as
     +2i,         -2i,             +1i           and            -1i
respectively which all seem to be imaginary.


             Further, we find that the spin 1 and spin 0 both have associated particles (Ref.4). The present model brings out the fascinating feature that since the very fundamental notions of physics are marvelously changed or modified in the gravitational realm. Does it mean that we have anti-graviton, anti-scalar and the anti-vector particles as well? Not only anti-graviton but also anti-photon might exist. The anti-photon suggested by the present author way back in a paper presented at the Warangal Engineering College, AP, India (Ref.5) from other elementary particle symmetry group considerations of a higher order matrix formulation. Ref.6 gives the authors thoughts on High Energy Physics and Astrophysics.
                
A simple graphical representation illustrates the spin 2 and the scalar fields obtained as above by me through a diagonalization procedure. I have given the explicit values for the two possible values of Graviton and the Anti-Graviton for their spin values as obtained by the diagonalization procedure. These differ from the conventional +2 and the -2 values for the spins. The excess values may be termed as due to the presence of Spin 1, Spin 0 and their counterparts making up the total spin of Graviton and the Anti-Graviton. This is a rather a peculiar approach of assigning the quantum numbers and a radical departure from the conventional Quantum Theory assignments. Photon makes no explicit appearance in this formulation except perhaps its contribution to the quantum values of
Spin 2.83 and Spin -2.83 assignments.

Fig.2 The +2.83 and the -2.83 Spins for
Graviton and Anti Graviton and two Zero values for the two Scalars with them at the Origin


                The argument that perhaps these represent the spin 2 particles (more magnitude values than just 2) and the Scalar particles in a four dimensional representation instead of just the three dimensions seems to be plausible. However, the fractional quantum numbers to the Graviton and Anti-Graviton exist. Two Scalars refer to the two possible quanta namely, Graviton and Anti-Graviton.

In metric form we may write
ds^2=g11*dx^2+g22*dy^2+g33*dz^2+g44*dt^2 +2*g12*dx*dy
+2*g13*dx*dz -2*g14*dx*dt +2*g23*dy*dz-2*g24*dy*dt -2*g34*dz*dt
We have
ds^2= 2*dx^2 + 2*dx*dy-2*dx*dt -2*dy*dz - 2*dz^2 + 2*dz*dt

The diagonalization led to the four eigenvalues as
 -2.83, -0, 0 and 2.83.
Note the minus sign assignment for the zero quantum number.
The corresponding four eigenfunctions are

[.1464 -0.3536 -.8536 -.3536; .2507 .3612 .2507 -.8625;
.4326 -.7871 .4326 -0.782; .8536 .3536 -.1464 .3536]

The eigenfunctions for the zero eigenvalues differ very much, a finding of significance since the two values refer to the positive and the negative roots. The diagonalization led, to the world and its anti-world vectors.

CONCLUSIONS
The fractional quantum numbers to the Graviton and Anti-Graviton exist. Photon makes no explicit appearance in this formulation on diagnolization except perhaps its contribution to the quantum values of Spin 2.83 and Spin -2.83 assignments. Madhava Rao equation for spin 2 leads to the algebraic roots as +2i,-2i, +1i and -1i respectively that all seem to be imaginary. The anti-photon (in 1984) suggested, by the present author, way back in a paper presented, at the Warangal Engineering College, AP, India (Ref.3g) from other elementary particle symmetry group considerations of a higher order matrix formulation receives good support from the present work. Recent thoughts of Anti-Graviton through the lightning bouts on Earth seem to be enthralling.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
I am deeply indebted to Prof K R Rao D.Sc. (Madras). D.Sc. (London) of Andhra University Colleges, Waltair for his valuable suggestions and guidance of an insight in the subject of Physics and Mathematics during the years 1955-1972.


REFERENCES

1. D. Deutsch and A. Ekert, page.71, Scientific American, September 2012
2. B S Madhava Rao, Proc. of Ind. Acad. of Science, Vol. XV, No.3, Sec. A, 1942
3. a). 1. K. L. Narayana, Invited Talk presented at GRG, 8th National Symposium,
at Bhavnagar, 1978.
2. K. L. Narayana, “On the Unification of Gravitation and the Quantum Theory”, in
Shivaji University Journal 1979.
3. K. L. Narayana, All India Symposium “On Integral Transforms” at Shivaji University,
Kolhapur, on 21 November 1979 “On the unification of Gravity and Quantum Theory”
b). K. L. Narayana, Kolhapur Proc.67th Ind. Sci. Cong. Part B Abstracts Calcutta, 1980
Paper No.7 ,  On “Charmed spin 5/2 graviton within a super-gravity formalism” also
K. L. Narayana, “Multiplet content and sum-rules of weak lepton-hadron super-currents in a
SU (8) super-quark model”, Paper No.8, of 67th Ind. Sci. Cong. Part B pages 61 and 62, 1980.
c). K. L. Narayana, Proc 67th Ind. Sci. Cong. Part III, “Beharrung guage approach and an Unified
Model of gravitational, electromagnetic and strong interactions” Paper No. 108, 1980,
d). 1. K. L. Narayana, Kolhapur, Proc.68th Ind. Sci. Cong Part III: Banaras Hindu Univ, Varanasi,
Dt. 3/1/1981. “Graviton-Anti-Graviton Annihilation and Creation of Fermi Quark F-Meson
Pair Multiplet”, Paper No.114, 1981
2. K. L. Narayana, “On Spin-Gravity in a new Renormalized Theory of Electro-weak Interactions
and Gravy-Changing (neutral) Currents existence”, 69th Sess. of Ind. Sci. Cong.
Mathematics section, Paper No.147, page 62, Manasagangotri, 1982 (Reviewed in
Indian Express News Paper, dt.7th Jan 1982)
e).K. L. Narayana,” A Cosmod Gauge, Current and Vorticity Characteristics of
Cosmod Transformations for Spin 2 Gravitons”, Paper No. 144, Proc. 70th Ind. Sci. Cong. Sect.
Sri Venkateswara University, Mathematics, Tirupati, 1983
f). K. L. Narayana, Silver Jubl. Symp. “On Variational Methods in Continuum Mechanics”,
Regional Engg. College, Warangal, Mathematics Department, September 2nd, 1984
g). K. L. Narayana, (late abstract) “Physical process of Gravitons and Gravy Quark in the
Interior of Super Gravity Cosmic Stellar structures” paper No.72, Sess. of Ind. Sci. Cong.
Lucknow, Phy. Sect. January 5th, 1985
h). K. L. Narayana in the book Ed by Weber et al on Eddigton Centenary Symposium held
in Nagpur in January 1984. Gravitational Radiation and Relativity,
World Scientific, pages. 315, “Physical process of Gravitons and Gravy Quark in the
Interior of Super gravity Cosmic Stellar structures” and as well on 298, Paper entitled by
K. L. Narayana,” The Origin of new primaries’ from “Cygnus X-3” and “Centarum”
Astrophysical Objects and a Gravy Quark Star”. 1986.
i). K. L. Narayana," Gravitational Instability generated by Stochastic processes and the New
Plasma Waves”, 73rd Ind. Sci. Cong, Delhi, listed as late Paper No.2, Section Physics,
held in January 1986
j). 1.K.L.Narayana, “On Gravitational Invariant particle wave equations in a generalized
Lyra Space”, GR-10, Conf. Institute de Fisica “G.Galilei” Padova- Italy, 1986
2. K. L. Narayana, “Quadrupolar binding of Gravitational free Quarks”, GR-10,
Conf. Institute de Fisica “G.Galilei” Padova- Italy, 1986.
3. K.L.Narayana, “On Spinorial and Materialistic Optical Cosmod Invariants and
    Cosmod Gravity”, 73rd Sess. Of Ind. Sci. Cong. Delhi, Physics Section, Jan 1986.
k). K. L. Narayana, Modern Physics and Theoretical Physics Educational Workshop 6th June to 11th, Souvenir cum Proceedings Held at Dept. of Phys, Sangameswara College, Sholapur organized under ULP, COSIP programme of Shivaji University, Kolhapur-416004, June 1987
“A comparative Simulation Programme for Generated Quark Composite States During Hadron Collision Processes and the Significance of Planck’s Quantum of Action.” Paper page 19. June 1987

l). K L. Narayana, Shivaji University, Kolhapur-416004, Maharashtra State, “A Model for Gravity Waves 2.82GHz (in S-Band) and Photodetection Observation made at Kolhapur of 24th Oct.1995 Partial Solar Eclipse and Comparative Study with The Alaska 20th July 1963 Total Solar Eclipse Data”, Proc. 84th Ind.Sci. Cong. Held at Delhi, held in 1997, Part III (Advance Abstract) p.35-36, Section X: Mathematics. The eclipse proceeded by an Earthquake during the early hours and observations are of considerable significance explicitly stated in Paper No.68, 1997. (See also Paper No.67 by me on Page 31)
4. See below the J L Powell and B Crasemann Angular Momentum and Spin page 333 in their book on Quantum Mechanics published in 1963 initialed by Prof K R Rao, D.Sc. (Madras). D.Sc. (London)


  Fig.3    Signature initials of Late Prof K R Rao
            D.Sc. (Madras). D.Sc. (London)


5. K. L. Narayana, Silver Jubl. Symp. “On Variational Methods in Continuum Mechanics”,
Regional Engg. College, Warangal, Mathematics Department, September 2nd, 1984
6. K L Narayana, “A possible Cosmological High Energy Universe” High Energy Physics and Astrophysics International Conference” September 9th, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, 1987

Address:
Professor Kotcherlakota Lakshmi Narayana
(Retd. Prof of Physics, SU, Kolhapur)
17-11-10, Official Colony, Maharanipeta. P. O.
Visakhapatnam-530002 (AP), India.
Mobile No.9491902867

List of Publications
on Gravitation before my retirement from Shivaji University, Kolhapur 416004, i.e. during 1966 June 1st to 2000 July 31st.

Note that the missing numbers below of references refer to publications made by me not related to Gravitational Physics.

10. K.L.Narayana, “On the unification of gravitation and the quantum theory”, Shivaji University, (1979) and Invited talk presented at GRG, 8th National Symposium at Bhavnagar (1978)

*17. K. L. Narayana, “A new field quantization approach to Gravitation and Bosonic gravitons of Spin 5/2”, Indian Science Congress, Hyderabad, 1979. Physics Section (Late Paper).

*18. K. L. Narayana, “Spin 5/2 Graviton-like particles and their relativistic motion in a central force field”, 66th Session of Ind. Sci. Congress Association, Hyderabad, Physics Section, Paper No. , 1978.

*19. K. L. Narayana, “Physical orthonormalization criteria for graviton Spinor wave functions, Chirality projections and hyper-number √1”, 66th Session of Ind. Sci. Congress Association, Hyderabad, Physics Section, Paper No. , 1978.

*20.K. L. Narayana, “ Non-compact Group ( 3,2) spectrum for Graviton of Spin 5/2 under Bose Einstein statistics and symmetry aspects”, Albert Einstein Centenary Symposium, Bose Institute of Physical Sciences, Calcutta, 1979, Dec 31st and March 1-4, 1979.

76. Dr. K. L. Narayana, “On other Gravity Possibilities of Gravitation” Vol.1, p.641, Einstein Centenary Symposium, Nagpur University, Nagpur, held on Feb,20th 1980, Duhita Publishers, Einstein Foundation, Nagpur, Edts. K. Kondo and T. M. Karade.

77. K. L. Narayana, “Multiplet content and Sum rules of Weak Lepton-Hadron super currents in a SU(8) super-quart model” Ind. Sci. Cong. Jadavapur University, Paper No.6, Physics Section, (Sat) Feb. 2, 1980.

78. K. L. Narayana, “Charmed Spin-5/2 graviton, within a super-gravity formulation” Ind.Sci. Cong, Session, 67th Jadvapur University, Calcutta, Physics Section, Paper No.5, February 2, 1980.

79. K. L. Narayana, “Beharrung Gauge approach and an Unified Model of Gravitation, Electromagnetism and Strong interactions”, 67th Ind. Sci. Cong. Session, Jadavpur University, Calcutta, Mathematics section, Feb.6th Paper No. ,1980.

88. K.L.Narayana, “Space Science analysis of the 19th Nov.1977 Indian Pennisular Double cyclones and their gravitational interaction and a model of helical cyclonic metric structure.” Physics Section, No. 89, Ind. Sci. Cong. B.H. University, Varanasi, 3-8th Jan 1981.

89. K. L. Narayana, “Graviton and Anti-Graviton annihilation and creation of Fermi-Quark and f-meson pair multiplets” mathematics section, paper No. 114, Ind.Sci. Cong. Session 68th, B.H. University, Varanasi, 3-8th Jan 1981.

90. K. L. Narayana, “Spinorial-Optical Collinations and a theory of Massive Charged vector Bosons”, Mathematics section, Paper No.110, Ind.Sci.Cong 68th Session, B.H.University, Varanasi 3-8th Jan 1981.

91. K. L. Narayana, “On the Nilch admittance tensor of relativistic Plasma” ,

Paper No. K15, First All Ind. Symp.on Plasma Physics, Ind. Institute of Technology, Delhi, December 16, 1981.

93. K. L. Narayana,” on the nature of tropical monsoon depression and their interactions based on a helical metric structure model”, Symposium on Theoretical Studies: Theoretical Physics Group: Shivaji University, Kolhapur, 12th July 1981,

94. K. L. Narayana, “On the violation of the metric reversal invariance symmetry and Existence of a new n-Meson”, Symposium on Theoretical Studies: Theoretical Physics Group, Shivaji University, Kolhapur-416004, 12 July 1981.

100. K. L. Narayana,” On certain New Conserved Quantities governing the behavior of Magneto-Fluids in General Relativity” paper No.12: MATSCIENCE, Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Madras, Conference on Special and General Relativity and Applications” 16th to 21st, Feb., 1982.

103. K. L. Narayana, “On Spin-Gravity in a new Renormalized Theory of

Electro-Weak interactions and Gravy-changing (neutral) Current existence”
Paper No.147, the 69th Session of Ind.Sci.Cong. Mathematics Section, Manasagangotri, 7th Jan 1982. (Indian Express News Paper: 7-1-1982).

104. K. L. Narayana. “Spinorial Optical Collineations in the General Theory of Relativity and on Nilch Tensor and Nilch Scalars”, Paper No.54, in 69th Session, Manasagangotri, 7th January 1982.

108. K. L. Narayana, “A Cosmod Gauge, Current and Vorticity Characteristics of Cosmod Transformations for Spin-2 Gravitons”, 70th Proc. of Ind. Sci. Cong. held at Tirupati Shri Venkateswara University, Mathematics section, 5th January 1983.

109. K. L. Narayana, Paper No.144, “ Magnetic Monopoles, Isorotation and Stream lines of Geodesic Flow of MHD in Magnetic Plasma Stars”, 70th Proc. of held at Tirupati Shri Venkateswara University, Mathematics section, 5th January 1983.

110. K. L. Narayana, “ On certain new conserved quantities Governing the behavior of Magnetofluids in General Relativity”, Paper No.12, MATSCIENCE Conf. on General Relativity and Special Relativity and its applications, 21st December 1982.

111. K. L. Narayana, “On complex angular momenta of Magnetic-Plasma stars and Gravitational dyons”, 1st Dec 1982, Paper No.11: MATSCIENCE conf on General Relativity and Special Relativity and its applications, 21st December 1982.

*112. K. L. Narayana, “Stability of Radial Modes and Magnetic Monopole (Gauge Quantal) solutions of Relativistic Magnetic Plasma stars”, Gorakhpur, Paper No. 8th Proc. Ind. Astronomical Society, 3rd to 6th November 1982.

114. K. L. Narayana,” on Super-Gravity theories and Meta Physical Models of Hindu Vaisheshika Philosophy”, AHPS, 5th January at 70th session of Proc. of Ind.Sci. Cong. Tirupati, 1983.

115. K. L. Narayana,” Magnetic Monopoles their constituents, GUT and Cosmological types of Magnetic Monopoles”, 11th December, Symp. On Theoretical Studies, Shivaji University, Kolhapur-416004, 1983.

117. K. L. Narayana,” on Gravitational Invariant Particle Wave Equations in a generalized Lyra Space”, GR-10, Conf. Institute of di Fisica “G.Galilei”, Padov, Italy,

118. K. L. Narayana, “Gravitational Gauge potentials with twenty-spin-coefficients and an extended electro-weak theory”, GR-10, Conf. Institute di Fisica “G.Galilei” Padov, Italy.

119. K. L. Narayana, “Quadrupolar Binding of Gravitational free Quarks”,
GR-10, Conf. Institute di Fisica “G.Galilei” Padov, Italy.
120.
          1. K. L. Narayana, Silver Jubl. Symp. “On Variational Methods in Continuum Mechanics”, Regional Engg. College, Warangal, Mathematics Department, September 2nd, 1984

           2.K. L. Narayana, “Gravitational Instability generated by stochastic process and new plasma waves.” Mathematics section, 73rd Ind. Sci. Cong. Delhi University, 1986.

121. K. L. Narayana, “ Relativistic Plasma Instabilities in terms of Nilch and Electromagnetic potential Twistor fields”,73rd Ind. Sci. Cong. Delhi University, 1986.

122. K. L. Narayana, “Topological Helicity Formulation and a new Elucidation of Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle”, Paper No.20, Proc. 73rd session of Ind. Sci. Cong. University of Delhi, Physics Section, 1986.

123. K. L. Narayana, “on spinorial and materialistic optical tensor invariants and Cosmod Gravity”, Physics section, Paper No.21, Proc. 73rd session of Ind. Sci. Cong. University of Delhi, Physics Section, 1986.

126. K. L.Narayana,” on spinorial and Materialistic optical Cosmod tensor Invariants and Cosmod Gravity”, 73rd Sess. Ind. Sci. Cong. Delhi January 6th, Physics Section, 1986 and 72nd sess. Of Ind. Sci.Cong. Lucknow, Mathematics section, January 6th, 1985.

135. K. L. Narayana, “ On the components of the Fundamental Third Rank Tensor of General Relativity”, RESO, 11th Int. Conf. on General Relativity and Gravitation, Stockholm, July 6th, 1986.

137. K. L. Narayana, “Physical Process of Gravitons and Gravy Quarks in the Interior of Supergravity Cosmic stellar structures”, 72nd Sess. Of Ind. Sci. Cong. Lucknow, January 5th, 1985 and Proc.of Sir Arthur Eddington Centenary Symposium, Vol.3 Nagpur, 23 February, 1984.

138. K. L. Narayana, “ Gravitational Instability generated by Stochastic processes and the new plasma waves”, 73rd sess. Ind. Sci. Cong. Delhi January 5-7th, 1986.

139. K. L. Narayana,”Relativistic Plasma Instabilities in terms of Nilch and EM potential twistor Fields”, Mathematics section, 73rd Sess. Ind. Sci. Cong. Delhi, Jan 5-7th, 1986.

140. K. L. Narayana, “The flexuous Instabilities of Confined Plasma”, (Anu Bhavan CSMM, Bombay, Govt.of India, October, letter No.10/26/21/85-ER/4039) 11th Int. Conf on Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion, ROS: Kyoto, Japan, November 13-20, 1986.

142. K. L. Narayana, “A possible Cosmological High Energy Universe”, High Energy Physics and Astrophysics Int. Conf: University of Kashmir, Srinagar, Dated 9th September 1987.

145. K. L. Narayana,
74th Sess. Ind. Sci. Cong. Bangalore Mathematics section, (presented) 1987:

(a). “Mathematical Formulation of Stochastic Quark lattice degeneracy and Sum rule selections”, Paper No.65 (Sect.VII)

(b). “The Origin of New Primaries from “Cygnus X-3” and “Centaur” Astrophysical objects and the Gravy Quark star” Paper No.123, (Sect.III), Page 68.

(c). “Novel techniques of Potential distributed spinorial (Rangadhama) Optical quanta ratio thermometry”, Paper No.45, (Sect.III), Page.26.

148. K. L. Narayana,”Gravy Quarks supergravity formulation and Cosmic string generation of Particles”, Global Conf. on Mathematical Physics (Cent. Celebrations of Niels Bohr and H. Weyl) Einstein Foundation International Oct 25, University of Nagpur, (Page.62), 1987.

*179. Kotcherlakota. L. N. “Waves and Plasma in the Environment of Comets”,
6th Asia Pacific Physics Conference Aug. Kulalampur, Malaysia.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Papers having missing Paper No. * starred.
This list continues with my publications in
trusciencetrutechnology@blogspot.com
after my retirement from Shivaji University, Kolhapur-416004.

No comments: